A few common misconceptions in the interpretation of experimental spectroscopic data

database, nuove specie, discrediti,
ridefinizioni, classificazioni, ecc.
Rispondi
Avatar utente
Marco E. Ciriotti
Messaggi: 31675
Iscritto il: ven 25 giu, 2004 11:31
Località: via San Pietro, 55 I-10073 Devesi/Cirié TO - Italy
Contatta:

A few common misconceptions in the interpretation of experimental spectroscopic data

Messaggio da Marco E. Ciriotti » dom 11 set, 2022 8:25

Referenza:
▪ Brik, M.G., Srivastava, A.M., Popov, A. (2022): A few common misconceptions in the interpretation of experimental spectroscopic data. Optical Materials, 127, 112276.

Abstract:
Proper presentation and interpretation of the experimental spectroscopic data is critical to understanding of the luminescence of solids that can increase fundamental scientific knowledge and serve as a practical guide to the development of commercially useful phosphors and other functional optical materials. We find prevalence of erroneous interpretation of the spectroscopic data in scientific reports that are caused by mistakes related to the estimation of the experimental band gaps, location of the defect levels in the band gaps, decomposition of the wide spectral bands into individual Gaussians and meaningful comparison of full widths at half maximum (FWHM). We hope that citing these issues will help researchers avoid making these common mistakes in the interpretation of the spectroscopic data.
Marco E. Ciriotti

«Things are interesting only in so far as they relate themselves to other things»

Rispondi

Chi c’è in linea

Visitano il forum: Nessuno e 48 ospiti